Tuesday, October 25, 2016

ANALYSIS OF EAVAN BOLAND’S “ANOREXIC”


 NADIA QARAQRA, 2016



“Flesh is heretic.
My body is a witch.
I am burning it.
Yes I am torching
her curves and paps and wiles.
They scorch in my self denials.
How she meshed my head
in the half-truths
of her fevers
till I renounced
milk and honey
and the taste of lunch.
I vomited
her hungers.
Now the bitch is burning.
I am starved and curveless.
I am skin and bone.
She has learned her lesson.
Thin as a rib
I turn in sleep.
My dreams probe
a claustrophobia
a sensuous enclosure.
How warm it was and wide
once by a warm drum,
once by the song of his breath
and in his sleeping side.
Only a little more,
only a few more days
sinless, foodless,
I will slip
back into him again
as if I had never been away.
Caged so
I will grow
angular and holy
past pain,
keeping his heart
such company
as will make me forget
in a small space
the fall
into forked dark,
into python needs
heaving to hips and breasts
and lips and heat
and sweat and fat and greed.”[1]




E
avan Boland, the Irish poet most famous for the depiction of Irish methodology and womanhood, raw truths, strong imagery of emotions, and the feminist view of history in her work; had “Anorexic” written as part of “her fifth book, In Her Own Image (1980)”[2] which received a universal literary applause for the stoutness and bold themes it brought to a dusty table.

The first stripes she lines up in the poem and the title in the flesh -in 1980 more than now, but up till today- create a certain stir besides irritation that keeps you swinging along the sides of each line carefully.
Irish literature and culture have been throughout the history ones of the most drastic in the depiction of the woman and her roles conclusively. Boland along with authors and poets at the time, came to blows and staged a legitimate strife with this stereotype, exerting themselves to achieve the noblest goal of poetry and literature; change a belief, alter a stereotype; hence a whole cooperative communital modification.

Tracing the allusions made in the poem is a gripping process; an allusion to Adam and Eve was made in:

Thin as a rib
I turn in sleep.
My dreams probe”.

 This quotation explores the profoundness of her starvation as a woman, her inclination to return back to Adam’s rib. Being criticized, or her physicality is never an issue in the poem; she is powerful and vividly willing to let her body buckle down to ash, unsettled with her body with her soul in the air. She is Eve here, and returning to Adam’s rib is her way to righteousness.


Repetition of the most sensitive while solemn parts of the body in a disfigured way brings us to think that a strong link was made, between the body and the soul, repentance and sin, corpus and conscience. In this poem the woman reunites, her body is a witness of her strength and willingness, her genitals are searching confession, and her soul is on its way to freedom and peace. Surprisingly enough, fighting her body’s needs and natural desires; redeems her.


I heard many different voices throughout the poem, sometimes it seems as if this corpus itself is the speaker, torturing the woman; “the bitch is burning”, “I vomited her hungers” and much more. This adds up to the texture of the poem, and forces us to ask again, do our bodies speak for us? Do our bodies torture us? And this is an important theme of Biological Anthropology in the main. Our desires and tendencies, our needs and feelings; are sometimes absolute, sometimes they neither rhyme with our mentalities nor make peace with our spirit in its essence. This gives rise to the topic of Alterity and the exiles we have in us, for example when the speaker refers to her own body as a ‘witch’. A witch is the ostracized, never passable in any community type of character. Nobody has a soft spot for a witch; we’re alarmed and petrified of the witch. Nevertheless, a witch is invincible, able to reach the impossible, bearing an inner power that can defeat the greatest powers and curse them into dust.


Anxiety; a seriously prevailing fraction of an anorexic’s life, suspense is dominant, there’s an expectation, freedom and conciliation are anticipated. Torn between the body and the soul, she is nervous looking forward to her ‘rebirth’. Identity is lost and the desire to change her own self is taking over. This reminds me of “The Danish Girl” and the emotional revolution against her birth body en route to her very own intrinsic image of herself.

The female poet is exposed at the middle of the poem, as the themes and the imagery of many female authors tend to have the same sense of enclosure, escape, physical discomfort and the obsessive depiction of diseases as claustrophobia and anxiety, representing a renouncement of the patriarchal society at most and sneering at the long tradition of manipulation of a woman both physically and emotionally in Irish literature, depicted as a sex-driven yet desirable tool.


Temptation is weighed against the search for a sexual identity, but strength is the most absolute theme of the poem occupying even the most fragile lines, against this self-imposed yet hated illness. Her anorexia is her strength, and it will unleash her from the horrors of the painful self-contempt explicitly contemplated.
 


Sweat, fat, greed; she mingles what is tangible with the intangible, crewing herself out of this internalized damnation, she is restless, physically and psychologically. Even after the poem ends, despite the affirmations that the whole lot will be blue-ribboned again, that the renaissance will take place by and by, that the vanishing of the body will turn into a godly celebration and an emancipation of the soul; the reader finishes the poem with a lump in the throat, aware that the soul could never be unleashed with the termination of the body.





[1] Boland, Eavan, The Norton Introduction to Poetry”. J. Paul Hunter, Alison Booth, and Kelly J. Mays. 9th edition. New York: Norton, 2007. P: 335-336.
[2] "Eavan Boland", Poetry Foundation, 2010. Web. 24 October 2016 <https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems-and-poets/poets/detail/eavan-boland>

Monday, October 24, 2016

STUDY ON ALTERITY AS VIEWED BY SERPIL OPPERMANN AND SERENELLA IOVINO



NADIA QARAQRA, 2016




M
any ecocritical inquiries related to postcolonialism and ecofeminism have been carried out by many philosophers, thinkers and authors of diverse contemplative stances, most prominently; I will be comparing chapter twenty three of “TOXIC BODIES AND ALIEN AGENCIES, Ecocritical perspectives on ecological others” by Serpil Oppermann and “LOVING THE ALIEN. ECOFEMINISM, ANIMALS, AND ANNA MARIA ORTESE’S POETICS 
OF OTHERNESS” by Serenella Iovino each according to the literary applications to their texts of choice; In order to form a thorough comprehension of their views on Alterity.


Alterity, not only-but also The Other; is this second party, always the second party, effortlessly identified in a literary text or an ecocritical research paper; the imperfect, the insufficient and deficient in comparison to the 1st person laying out the text.


While some might find Oppermann’s title flagrant and sometimes outrageous; one might think that Iovino’s is nobly falsified for a paper of this nature. Therefore, for a reader of expertise – which is the target audience for both studies- despite disagreeing with Oppermann; this outrightness draws us to her watertight text, where she backs up her judgment with a language exposing a high level of intelligence, keen knowledge and intense confidence. On the other hand, the title of Iovino is a sweetener to the case tackled; a more peaceful approach is anticipated. And Iovino, as Oppermann; declared whose side she was on in between the lines of the appellation.


Going through the lines of Oppermann, our first impression of her point of view intensifies and becomes more explicit, Opperman BELIEVES in the binary opposite, which   “implies a centring or imposition of order: such binary signification is stable and systematic to structuralists, and unstable and decentred to poststructuralists.”[1]   It is not only in literature that she believes in the existence of the binary opposite, rather in any socially structured community even beyond naturalism; “I frame my view by reading the body as a material text in which cultural practices, social and political decisions, and environmental processes are intertwined with issues of justice, health, and ecology”. In addition, he linked that to the Social Behavioral Structure, subjoining the body and the environment firmly. It appears that Opperman is at last a fan of connections and ecocritical attachments; as he brings up ecocriticism and compares it to postcolonialism, he produces a new accouchement, Postcolonial Ecocriticism.


Before getting to Iovino’s ecofeminism friendly article; posthumanism stroke my mind, not only because of the accumulation of posts: (postcolonialism, postnaturalism, postcolonial ecocriticism, etc.…) but also because on account of both essays, we are somehow brought to reflect and meditate on Alterity from a posthumanist microscope. Iovino opens up her research with a notion of this in her abstract;   “Building my theoretical discourse mostly on feminist animal studies, material ecocriticism, and posthumanism, I consider the work of the Italian writer Anna Maria Ortese (1914- 1998) and her “creaturely poetics of otherness,” as exemplified in particular by her novel The Iguana.”[2]


The bibliography used by both writers is long and detailed, while the main weight of the articles depended heavily on quotations and evidence from either Sarah Jaquette Ray along with Nancy Langston by Oppermann.  And Anna Maria Ortese’s Poetics
Of Otherness over and above quotes of Oppermann herself in the case of Iovino.


In a different occasion onward in his text, we take notice in Oppermann taking her language to a different level, trying to convince the audience of the dangers put out by the ‘toxic bodies’ and raising a red flag warning hereafter;  “In what follows, a brief reading of two novels by a Turkish and an American author may help to substantiate my argument that the stories bodies tell about their trans-corporeal dynamics reflect the dangerous circulation of alien agencies and toxic discourses across living bodies regardless of national boundaries as well. In particular, Berji Kristin: Tales from the Garbage Hills (1983) by Latife Tekin and Gain (1998) by Richard Powers epitomize how “the environmental crisis is really the crisis of the body.”41 Moreover, they effec- tively capture bodily stories by telling gripping and intimate tales about ecological otherness. In more general terms, however, embodying postcolonial and material ecocritical perspectives in a balanced way, they alert us to the socio-ecological significance of the mesh of human and other-than-human environments. I want to show that, regardless of their local differences (concerning Turkish and American cultures), these two texts reveal vividly that hazardous material agencies are oblivious to all class, gender, culture, or species boundaries.” [3]   We can see from this quote how The Other in every color is set forth by Oppermann, she did not leave any underlying distinctive category of ecocrticism she did not exploitatively maneuver to belay her examination of the topic, and in the same context posing over and over again how the toxic body converts into the ecological other.


As expected, Iovino goes on by standing up for the feminist view of Alterity as she elucidates;  “Let us think, for example, of the way feminist thinkers such as Karen Warren, Val Plumwood, Carolyn Merchant, Karen Warren, Carol Adams, Rosemary Radford Ruether, and Greta Gaard, theorize difference in ecological terms. In their view, the category of difference is conceived not simply as a gender issue, but as but as a macro-category that includes and structures many forms of otherness. In the failed acknowledgement of the human-nonhuman interdependency (Plum- wood speaks of “denied dependency”) an “alienated identity of dominance” is built and “naturalized” by a materially and conceptually oppressive power that “construes and constructs difference in terms of an inferior and alien realm.”[4] Citing works of feminists and enthroning herself to be the spokesman of feminists on this stage, similarly; she uses strong decisive language to steady her lofty stance.


In conclusion; both observations in the two arguments we have debated through the scope of Alterity for that matter, adopt two completely different schools of thought. While Oppermann tries to enhance an extremely squeaky image in the reader’s minds raising the questions of race, class, gender, and the opposite binary which is doomed to be ‘against the grain’ and posing a great danger simply being ‘the ecological other’ according to her postcolonial ecocritical view; We find Iovino exposing the well known feminist ethics of tackling a topic and well supporting it with a romantic language while combating the traditional view of The Other and proposing a modern genuine and favorable argument that denies ostracization and alienation of The Other quoting Oppermann herself and refuting her argument scientifically and methodically.

I personally found myself leaning towards neither in this matter although identifying to an extent with Iovino. Nevertheless, I was eager for a strong unbiased refutation, I was seeking less feminism defense and zealous for more human stance on the topic. I trust, that in order to create and grow, The Other is a fundamental keystone of a rich substance, but I’m a proponent of The Togetherness. I believe in my individuality as well as in my Otherness, which is generated by realizing and absorbing all that which I am not, and all that constitutes me.
Finally, chapeau to both authors for mingling a detailed orientation of information and human-life analysis with reality; through language, literature, and research. 

              

Left to Right: Serenella Iovino, Serpil Oppermann.



[1] "Binary Opposition." A Dictionary of Literary Terms and Literary Theory. Cuddon, J. A. Blackwell Publishing, 2013. Blackwell Reference Online. 14 October 2016 <http://www.blackwellreference.com/subscriber/tocnode.html?id=g9781444333275_chunk_g97814443332753_ss1-43>
[2] Iovino, Serenella. “Loving The Alien. EcoFeminism, Animals, And Anna Maria Ortese’s Poetics Of Otherness”. Università di Torino, 09/10/2013, p.177.

[3] Oppermann, Sepil. Toxic bodies and alien agencies: Ecocritical perspectives on ecological others. P. 417.
[4] Iovino, Serenella. “Loving The Alien. EcoFeminism, Animals, And Anna Maria Ortese’s Poetics Of Otherness”. Università di Torino, 09/10/2013, p.180.

Wednesday, October 19, 2016

REPORT ON HARRIS'S " THE BURIED LIFE OF THE FACTS OF LIFE: CORPOREAL COMING-OF-AGE IN GIRLS' SCHOOL STORIES 2013"


REPORT ON “THE BURIED LIFE OF THE FACTS OF LIFE: CORPOREAL COMING-OF-AGE IN GIRLS’ SCHOOL STORIES” 2013

NADIA QARAQRA, 2016


I
 Was drawn to the article titled “The Buried Life of the Facts of Life: Corporeal Coming-of-Age in Girls’ School Stories” by the North American Studies Association Presented and uploaded to Academia by
Jacqueline H. Harris, who was an alumni in the University of Nebraska-Lincoln at the time; because while children literature and young adult literature is my favorite genre, L.T. Meade is my long-time idolized canon of this genre.

The title of the paper is clouded over yet still appealing and very engaging to me, I had to bookmark the paper before reading it, coming-of-age is a theme not well applauded for or celebrated as it should be. Sometimes it’s even oppressively encompassed as a bullet under the title of feminism when criticizing and analyzing different texts of literature up till today.

While Harris manipulated the paper by going through the details of the stories and the personal life of the author; the deftly interlocked loops of the title made me anticipate more criticism and personal attributions of the researcher herself than the already known to a Meade reader.

But then again, in defense, Harris would have knit this paper to students who did not get to meet Meade through her words, she might have wanted to be the matchmaker and build an understanding of Meade in the minds of the students how she viewed it best. The paper is absolutely general; anybody with a slight interest in the field can stop by it and gain a handsome by going through the analysis of Harris.
Towards the end of the paper, Harris was finally breaking her shyness and showed some of her blunt judgments on the topic.

“This excerpt from a chapter of my interdisciplinary dissertation seeks to reveal signifiers of female physical maturation in L. T. Meade’s girls’ school stories; in other words, the buried life of the facts of life.”[1] A very strong and well-put thesis, clear, illustrated, down to earth, demystified, and fulfilling to the reader. I enjoyed the structure of the paper and the tidiness of ideas, there isn’t much of new ideas as expected, but what is presented is well structured and arranged to give you a full view on the subject in a methodical and stylish sequence that grabs your attention until the end.


I concluded many outcomes but the most prominent goes hereafter; there are many truthful images in the literary works that embrace a young lady as a protagonist or a secondary character; that are not being displayed, and if so, displaced, we tend to be perfectionists when writing for young adults or children, we tend to be conservative and Godly when aiming at a girlish young audience. Harris was very transparent when tackling the figures of authority always present to right the wrong and hold the deeds, in this case the nanny or the governess or simply a certain instructor. How girls physically had to achieve and obtain being admitted and approved as females, the underlying psychology was not treated as detailed as needed but the conclusion that had me thinking overnight, was without a doubt, the one procreated by her analysis of girls in literature as “compelled emotionally to separate from youth”. [2] Which is firmly to be contemplated upon and pulled downright our eyeglasses.








[1] Harris, Jacqueline. “The Buried Life of the Facts of Life: Corporeal Coming-of-Age in Girls’ School Stories”. North American Studies Association, 2013, P.1. < https://www.academia.edu/8423301/_The_Buried_Life_of_the_Facts_of_Life_Corporeal_Coming-of-Age_in_Girls_School_Stories> Web.
[2] Harris, Jacqueline. “The Buried Life of the Facts of Life: Corporeal Coming-of-Age in Girls’ School Stories”. North American Studies Association, 2013, P.4. < https://www.academia.edu/8423301/_The_Buried_Life_of_the_Facts_of_Life_Corporeal_Coming-of-Age_in_Girls_School_Stories> Web.

Saturday, January 9, 2016

المختلف هو الجميل



ماما وبابا أخبراني بأننا جميعا مختلفون، وهذا ما يجعلنا جميلين. لدينا جميعا  ثقافات مختلفة ونؤمن بديانات مختلفة، سيكون مملا إن أشبهنا بعضنا البعض، أو فكرنا جميعا بنفس الطريقة، أو تحدثنا اللهجة نفسها.
كل يوم في مدرستي، أرى بأن كل من حولي مختلف ومميز. لدينا جميعا ألوان بشرة مختلفة، أشكالنا مختلفة وأحجامنا أيضا. لكننا جميعا اطفال، وجميعنا نكبر كل يوم. بعضنا شعره طويل، وبعض منا شعره قصير، منا من شعره ناعم ومنا من شعره مجعد، بعضنا لا يقص شعره ويلبس طاقية أو منديل حسب دينه ومعتقداته.
لعيوننا أشكال مختلفة، هنالك منا من يرتدي نظارة ومنا من لا يرتديها. لكننا جميعا نرى أشياء جميلة حولنا. بعضنا يستخدم قدميه للمشي، والبعض الآخر يستعمل كرسيا متحركا. حتى أن بعضا منا يستخدم كلبا مرشدا أو عصا لمساعدته. لكننا جميعا نتنقل ونصل لأماكن مختلفة.
لربما تحدثنا لغات مختلفة أو تواصلنا بطرق مختلفة، لكننا جميعا تعلمنا أن نعبر عن مشاعرنا وأن نتفهم غيرنا. كل منا يتناول صنفا مختلفا من الطعام، لكننا جميعا نحب أن نأكل.

بعضنا يحب كرة السّلة، وبعضنا يحب السبع حجار، بعضنا يحب الغميضة وبعضنا يحب كرة القدم. حتى أننا نرقص لألحان وموسيقى مختلفة، لكننا في النهاية جميعا نحب أن نمرح ونلهو. كما ترى، نحن جميعا مختلفون ومميزون بطرق كثيرة، لذلك، في المرة القادمة التي ترى فيها شخصا مختلفا، من المهم أن تحترمه وتعامله كما تعامل الجميع. لأنه في المحصلة، المختلف هو الجميل، ونستطيع أن نتعلم الكثير من غيرنا في كل يوم.إستكشف وتعلّم، أحب من حولك، اهتم بمن حولك، شارك أصدقائك وعائلتك وكن فخورا بهم وبنفسك. ولا تنس احترام المختلف، لجماله... 



Monday, January 4, 2016

نـهـــايـة أسـبــوع





الأربعاء: 8:30 مساء

في يَومٍ غيْر ذاتِ الأيّام، بيْنما تَضِجُ الّليالي بالظّلام، وتَحمِلُ النّجومُ الأحلام، نَمتَطِيها إلى الأعْلى ونَصعَد، بَعيداً عن المدَارِس والحُلول وكُلّ خربَشاتِ الأقْلام، وبيْنما كَكِل ليْلة، أحَضّر نَفْسي لِلمَنام، يَبْدو أن سمّاعَتي ضاقَتْ بالكَلَام، خَلَعتُ السّماعَة ورُحتُ بنَفسِي، أرْقُص وأُغَنّي، أطْرَبُ في بِلادِ الألوان حَيثُ أنا وحَسْب الــرَّســامْ
.

الخميس: 7:10 صباحا

حِينَ تُطِلّ الشّمسُ في الصّباح، أولُ ما أراهُ بعدَ أشِعّة الشّمس – إنْ كانَتْ الدّنْيا صَيْفا- هِيَ ابتِسامَةُ أمّي. كَم هيَ جَميلةٌ ماما، كَم هِيَ سَعَادَتي بِوُجُودِها مَعِي دوْما. تُوْقِظُني أُمّي، وبَعْد أنْ تُشرِفَ على غَسْلي لِوَجهِي وأسْنانِي، تَتأكدُ من وَضْعي لِسَمّاعَتي ومِن أنْ أشْربَ كَأس الحَليْبِ كَامِلاً.
أصْعَد وأُمّي على مَتْن السّيّارة الحَمْراء، أمّي تُحِبّ اللّونَ الأحمَر، حتّى قَمِيصي، تَحْتَ السُّترَة الزّرْقاء، لَوْنُهُ أحْمر، بِما أنّه المُفَضّل لَدى أمّي فإنّه المُفضّل لَديّ أنا أيْضا.
عِيْسَى إن كُنْتُم تَتساءَلوْن، هذا هوَ اسْمي، تَماماً مِثلَ عِيْسى عَليْه السّلام في السّماء.
فِي الطّريْق إلى مَدْرَسَتي، أشْتَري وأمّي العَصيْر الطّازج ولوْحاً مِنَ الشُوكولَاتَه، ونَضْحكُ سَوِيّةً كَيْفَ لَنَا أنْ نَنْسى إحْضارَ محَارِم سبَايْدِرْ مَانْ الوَرَقِيّة المُلَوَّنة.
أتَرَجَّلُ مِن السّيارة بَعدَ أن أُقبّل أُمّي. ومُبَاشرةً أنزَعُ سمّاعَتي البْلاستيْكِيّة من أذنِي، فَقَدْ قَرّرتُ أنّه ليسَ عليّ أن أتَعَلّم العَرَبِيّة وأُصْغِي السّمَعَ وأقْرَأ الشّفاه، أوْ أُرْهِقَ نَفسِي في الحَديْث. على بَقِية الأفْراد تَعَلُّم لُغَة الإشارة، لأنها لُغتِي، إن أرادوا التّواصُل مَعِي.

فِي مَدرَسَتي، مَدْرسَة الشّمس، حتّى مُعلّمِي ومُعَلّماتِي، حتّى مُديْرَة المَدْرسَة، جَمِيعُنا نُجيْد لُغَة الإشارَة ونَسْتَخْدِمها فِيما بَيْنَنا. أنا وأصْدِقائي لا نَرتَدِي سَمّاعاتنا أبَداً، نَحنُ لا نَحتَاجُها، على العَكس، إن أردْنا الحَديْث عن شَخْص آخَر لا يُجِيدُ لُغَةَ الإشارَة، كانَتْ هَذهِ الوَسيلةُ الأفْضَل لِلحَديثِ عَنه دُون أن يَفْهَمَنا!
نَتَدَرّب كلّ آخِرِ نَهَارٍ أنا وأصْدِقائي تَحْضيراً لِلبُطولة الكُروية فِي نِهايَة هذا الأسْبوع.
عِنْدَ العَوْدة إلى البَيْت، هُنالِك العَديْدُ مِن الأطْفالِ والجِيران، لَكِن لا أحَدَ مِنْهُم صَدِيْقي، أنا لَسْتُ بِحاجَتِهِم ولا أحِبّهُم. لَديّ أصدِقائي في مَدرَسَة الشّمْس، وأمّي، وكُلّ مَن يُحِبّني يُجِيدُ التّعامُل مَعِي بِلُغة الإشارَة. لا داعِي لِلسّماعَة في الأساس، لا أفْهَم إصْرار أمّي عليّ بارتِدائها حَيثُ لا حاجَةَ إليْها.



الجمعة 8:00 صباحا

هذا هو اليَوْمُ المَنْشودْ، استَيْقَظتُ ولا زالتْ عَضَلاتُ سيْقانِي مَشْدودةً مِن تَدْريْب البَارِحة، لَقَد عَزمْنا على الفَوْز في مُباراةِ اليَوْم. 
الشّوْط الأوّل لَم يَكُن لِصالحِنا، لَمْ نَسْتَطِع الاسْتِماعَ لِصافِرَة الحَكَمْ، لَمْ نَسْتَطِع الانْدِماجَ مَع اللّاعبيْن الآخَريْن في الَملْعَب، لَمْ يَكُن دِفاعُنا مُهَيئاً لاستِقْبالِ كُرَةٍ جَديْدةٍ غَيْر كُراتِنا، أخَذَني الحُزنُ في المَلْعَب، استَطَعتُ أنْ أرَى هذا العَالَم خَارِج مَدْرَسَتي واضْطَرّ لِمُواجَهَتِه والتّفاعُلِ مَعه، عالمٌ لَطِيفٌ مَليءٌ بالألوان، لا أدْري لماذا لَطالَما أصرَرْتُ على عَزْلِ نَفْسي وإبْقائي فَقَط ضِمنَ مَجْموعَتي التّي لَديْها الحاجة الخاصَة ذاتُهَا.

في الوَقتِ المُستَقطَع، كان عَليّ أن أنتَهِز أيّ فُرْصَة لِتَعديل النّتيْجة وإنْصافِ فَرِيقي، حِينَ اجْتمَعْنا، تَحَدّثتُ مَع زُملائي، أخْبَرْتُهُم أنّه إنْ أرَدْنا أن يَفْهَمَنا العالمَ الخارِجيّ، إن أردْنا أن نَحميَ أنفُسَنا ، إنْ أرَدْنا أنْ نَلْعَبَ بِشَكلٍ أفْضَل، أن نَتَواصَل بِمُستَوى أجْمَل، اذا وَضَعْنا سَمّاعاتنا وتَفاعَلنا بالّلغَة، بِهذا نَكونُ قَد اكتَسَبنا خِبْرةً جَديدَة جَميلة جداً وأثْبَتْنا قُدْرَتنا على التّعَامُل لَيس فَقَط ضِمْن فِئتِنا ولَكِن أيْضاً مَعَ الأطفالِ مِن عُمْرِنا في العَالَم الجَميل.

بَعدَ هذا الحِوارِ مع الزّملاء، دبّت فيهم الطّاقة والقوّة، وسدّدتُ هَدَف التّعادُل بِقَدَمي اليُمْنى. تَعادَلْنا. وكُنّا سَعيْدينَ جداً.